Political Science 117:
The
Politics of Human Rights
Instructor: Kristina
Thalhammer
Holland Hall 103F, x3528
You may also call me at home
645-9040
or try me via e-mail thalhamm@stolaf.edu
GENERAL OUTLINE OF THE
COURSE:
This course will introduce
you to various conceptualizations of human rights and review a variety of
explanations offered by social scientists and others for why human rights
abuses occur. The instructor of this class assumes that it is easier to prevent
abuses from occurring if we understand their causes. As a class we will learn
about the most extreme form of government-authorized or supported human rights
abuse (i.e. genocide) as well as less extraordinary, smaller scale violations
of human rights. We will then
familiarize ourselves with a variety of theories (e.g. political, economic,
ideological, cultural, state-level, individual-level) for why violations of right
occur, and assess each theory in terms of available evidence. We will also
consider how one might set standards to protect these basic human rights.
In addition to looking at a number of cases of human
rights abuse, you will also be asked to develop some level of expertise about a
particular human rights violation. During this month, each student will choose
and research one historic or current episode in which violations of human
rights occurred or are occurring. In
addition to becoming familiar with the case you select, you will look for evidence
to assess how well the theoretical explanations, considered in this class,
might explain why abuses took place in this specific case. By presenting our findings to one another, we
will be better able to assess how well the existing explanations of Human
Rights violations fit the cases we have studied and consider whether other
factors might better explain the events in question.
Possible cases to explore would include: Rwandan
genocide, El Salvadoran and Guatemalan death squads, “ethnic cleansing” in the
former Yugoslavia, repression in Stalin’s USSR, the Tiananmen Square repression
in the People’s Republic of China, Pinochet’s use of torture, murder and
disappearance in Chile, Indonesia’s repression of separatists in East Timor,
ongoing repression of civilians by state, paramilitary and guerilla groups in
Colombia, US or other states’ treatment of Native or indigenous peoples, South
African Apartheid, the Greek secret police in the 1970s, Iran’s SAVAK prior to
1979, Uganda under Idi Amin, the Central African Republic under “Emperor”
Bokasa, Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.
Please note: You may not select
In addition to our consideration of the causes of human
rights abuses, we will also consider theories about how human rights abuses can
be ended or avoided. We will focus in
particular on episodes in which individuals or organizations have challenged or
disobeyed policies that violated human rights and on international initiatives
to punish perpetrators.
ASSIGNMENTS:
In just a few months, we will cover a variety of
hypotheses as to why human rights abuses occur.
Lectures, films and guest speakers will complement each day's
readings. You are expected to come to
each class having done the readings and ready to 1) summarize each author's
central argument, 2) look at whether they attempted to test their hypotheses,
and 3) assess what kind of evidence they use to support their approach or
suggest ways in which the author's claims could be assessed. The class will meet according to the schedule
listed below. Generally we will meet on
Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. On
occasion, we will view films or have visitors who cannot meet at our regularly
scheduled time. Please note the calendar below and pay attention to class
announcements and e-mails, which may alter our schedule.
TEXTS
There are three books
assigned for this class. The required texts are:
·
H.Arendt (1965) Eichmann in
·
R. Claude and B. Weston (1995) Human
Rights in the World Community,
·
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS: There
will be two exams during the course of this interim, covering the information
presented in the readings and in class.
Students will also be expected to prepare a two-part research paper,
investigating a particular episode of human rights abuse. The first part of the paper will be a summary
of the facts of the particular episode and a description of the context in
which this abuse occurred. In the second
half of this paper you will analyze possible causes for the abuses in question,
relating your proposed explanations to some of the theories considered in this
course. Be sure to cite the evidence
that led you to believe a particular factor or set of factors may have played a
role in the case you are studying.
Students will present their findings orally to their classmates and we
will use your findings as the basis of discussion and assessment of the
explanations being considered.
The assignments will
have the following weights:
Exam 1 25 percent
Paper Part 1 (5-7
pages) 25 percent
Paper Part 2 (5-7
pages) 25 percent
Final Exam 20
percent
General participation 5 percent
SCHEDULE AND READING ASSIGNMENTS:
PART I: Introduction to Human
Rights
Sept. 5: Introduction. Human Rights definitions and
theories. History of Human
Rights evolution. Administer RWA scale.
Sept. 8: Universalism v. Relativism, Ideological perspectives.
·
READ Claude and Weston pages
1-31; bring the Claude and Weston book with you to class for a discussion of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the African Charter, and the U.S. Bill of Rights
Sept. 10 and 12: The current international context of International Human Rights.
READ The Economist
“Human Rights Law” (online course
readings), Claude and Weston, pages 215-255.
·
Sikkink, K., "Human rights, principled issue networks, and
sovereignty in
This Weekend. Spend some time in the library, considering
various possibilities for your case study. (Each of you will select one
specific current or historic episode in which significant violations of human
rights occurred to be your case study.
<You may not select the Holocaust, Cambodia, Argentina, Turkey or the
US massacre in My Lai Vietnam, because these will be used extensively as
examples in the readings and lectures>
If you find a case that is of particular interest to you, e-mail your
colleagues (poli-sci-117a@stolaf.edu or poli-sci-117b@stolaf.edu) to reserve this
topic. There will be no duplication of
topics within a section, so be sure to make your choice known early!
PART II: Purported explanations
for genocide (economic, psychological,
cultural, spirals of violence, bystanders)
Sept. 15: Basic human needs as human rights. Does poverty cause abuse? Is
repression to achieve stability or development a necessary a necessary evil?
·
READ: Claude and Weston pages 137- 156.
Sept. 17: Topics
due. By this point you should have
signaled the class as to your chosen topic by sending e-mail to all of us. Remember, it's first-come, first served. If a topic has already been claimed, you will
have to choose another subject.
Sept. 17 and Sept. 19: Who commits human rights
abuses and why? Aggression, culture and other explanations. READ:
·
R. Baron, (1977) Human
Aggression. Plenum, pp. 191-212 (online course readings).
·
H. Arendt, ch. 2, 3, 8-13.
Sept. 22: Bibliographic Instruction Session in Library
Sept. 24 and 26: Episodes of genocide. READ:
·
Part I of Staub, pages 1-86.
Sept. 29 and Oct. 1: READ:
·
Part II of Staub (chapters 7-11)
Oct. 3: READ:
·
Either chapter 12, 13 or 14 of
Staub. Be prepared to summarize the events and context covered in the chapter
you chose for others in the class who read other cases. What explanations does
he offer for why this particular genocide occurred? Do you think the explanations hold across all
the cases he chose? Across other cases,
as well?
Oct. 6 : No Class --Work on
research for your papers. If you need help, meet with instructor about your
thesis and evidence to date during the extra office hours posted this week. IF
YOU CANNOT ATTEND SCHINDLER'S
Oct. 8: Preliminary Bibliography is due.
Oct. 8 and Oct. 10 : Spirals of violence,
madness of leaders, ideological and religious fervor as explanations for
genocide. READ:
·
K. R. Monroe "Review Essay:
The Psychology of Genocide " (1995) Ethics
and International Affairs, Vol. 9, 215-239 (online course readings)
·
N.J. Kressel,
"Introduction," Mass
Hate,
SPECIAL EVENING SESSION ON TUESDAY Oct. 14 from
SPECIAL SESSION WEDNESDAY Oct. 15 from
Visitor, Henry Oertelt,
Holocaust survivor and author of An Unbroken Chain. READ:
·
Staub, ch. 15.
October 17: Exam 1
FALL BREAK: No class on Oct.
20
October 22 and 24: Training, culture and other factors contributing
to massacre and war crimes– Film: “Frontline: Remember My Lai.”
READ:
·
H.C. Kelman and V.L. Hamilton (1989)
Crimes of Obedience, Yale pp. 1-76 (online course readings).
·
Excerpt from R. W.
Altemeyer (1989) Enemies of Freedom.
October 27 and 29: Structural and psychological explanations for
human rights abuse. Film: Obedience.
READ:
· S. Milgram (1965) "Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority," Human Relations, 18. (online course readings)
October 31 and Nov. 3 Economic, political and
cultural explanations for abuses. READ:
·
N. Mitchell and J. McCormick "Economic and Political Explanations
of Human Rights Violations (1988) World
Politics, pp. 476-498 (online course readings) for Nov. 5
·
Chapters 9-13 in Arendt (for Nov. 7)
·
Chapter 18 of Staub. (for Nov. 10)
· Stepan (1973) "The New Professionalism of Internal Welfare and Military Role Expansion" in Authoritarian Brazil (packet) Nov. 10.
November 5 and 7 : Torture -- Violations of the rights of the person – Visit
from representative of Center for Victims of Torture. READ:
·
Weston and Burns pages 58-88
· Excerpt from: Zimbardo, P.G., Haney, C., Banks, W.C., & Jaffe, D. (1974). The psychology of imprisonment: Privation, power and pathology. In Z. Rubin, Doing Unto Others. Prentice-Hall. (online course readings) 61-73.
· M. Haritos Fatorouris (1988) "The Official Torturer" Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18 1107-1120 (online course readings).
·
Huggins, Martha (2000)"Legacies of Authoritarianism: Brazilian
Torturers' and Murderers' Reformation of Memory." Latin American Perspectives, 27, 57-78 (online course readings).
***Paper is due at the beginning of class on Nov. 7. Late papers will be docked 10 percent of final
grade for every 24 hours late unless an agreement is reached with the
professor.***
PART III: Remedies and Preventions
Exemplars and Explanations for rescuing behavior
November 10, We will watch
"Weapons of the Spirit," a documentary based on the story of Le
Chambon. READ:
·
Shepela, Sharon Toffey, with Cook, J., Horlitz, E., Leal, R., Luciano,
S., Lutfy, E., Miller, C., Mitchell, G., Worden, E. (1999). Courageous Resistance: A Special Case of
Altruism. Theory and Psychology, 9(6):787-805.(online
course readings)
·
Recommended reading: Any portion of P. Hallie, (1979) Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed: The Story of the
November 12.. No class at our regular
time. Meet in Viking Theater from
November 14-21: Explanations for altruism
·
Nathan Stoltzfus, (1992) Dissent
in Nazi Germany, The Atlantic, Sept.
1992, v. 270 n. 3 p. 86 (8).
·
Staub, chapter 18 (for 11/17)
·
Oliner, S. P. and P. M. Oliner (1988) The Altruistic Personality.
·
Monroe, K. R. (1994) "But
What Else Could I Do?": Choice,
Identity and a Cognitive-Perceptual Theory of Ethical Behavior, Political Psychology, 15: 2 , 201-226
(online course readings) for 11/21.
November 24 Political Altruism: Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. READ:
·
K. Thalhammer "I'll Take the High Road," Political Psychology , vol. 22, No. 3, 2001, 493-519.
December 1: Genocide and Altruism in
·
Excerpt from P Gourevitch, We
Wish to Inform You that Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with our Families,
Dec. 3 Final paper due. Review of theories and
evidence. Oral Reports
Dec. 5 Oral reports continued
Dec. 8-10 : Strategies for ending/preventing human rights abuses discussion of
human rights activism, regimes and organizations. READ:
·
Ramacharam (No. 19); Donnelly (No. 21); and Wiseberg (No. 25); in Claude and Weston.
FINAL EXAM location and time to be announced.
Academic Accommodation: Any student with a documented disability needing
academic adjustments or accommodations is requested to speak with me during the
first two weeks of class. All
discussions will remain confidential.
Such students also need to contact Student Disability Services in the
Academic
misconduct: For the purposes of
this class, any act that violates the rights of another student in academic
work or that misrepresents your own work is considered academic misconduct and
is not permitted. This includes cheating
on assignments, plagiarizing (which means misrepresenting the work of another
as your own), and submitting the same paper or substantially similar papers to
fulfill the requirements of more than one class without the prior approval of
both instructors. All students are
expected to abide by St. Olaf’s honor code.