|
HOME
COURSE
INFORMATION
SYLLABUS
RESOURCES
Timeline
Indigenous People
Cultural Identity
Gender issues
Natural Environment
Photo
Gallery
|
FICTION
DOWN UNDER
English
215
| Natural
Environment--Australia |
Australia
is the world's sixth largest country and its largest island. It
is the only island that is also a continent, and the only continent
that is also a country. It was the first continent conquered
from the sea, and the last. It is the only nation that
began as a prison.
It is the home of the largest living thing on earth, the Great Barrier
Reef, and of the largest monolith, Ayers Rock (or Uluru to use its
now-official, more respectful Aboriginal name). It has more things
that will kill you than anywhere else. Of the world's ten most poisonous
snakes, all are Australian. Five of its creatures--the funnel web
spider, box jellyfish, blue-ringed octopus, paralysis tick, and
stonefish--are the most lethal of their type in the world. This
is a country where even the fluffiest of caterpillars can lay you
out with a toxic nip, where seashells will not just sting you but
actually sometimes go for you. Pick up an innocuous cone shell from
a Queensland beach, as innocent tourists are all too wont to do,
and you will discover that the little fellow inside is not just
astoundingly swift and testy but exceedingly venomous. If you are
not stung or pronged to death in some unexpected manner, you may
be fatally chomped by sharks or crocodiles, or carried helplessly
out to sea by irresistible currents, or left to stagger to an unhappy
death in the baking outback. It's a tough place.
And it is old. For 60 million years since the formation of the Great
Dividing Range, the low but deeply fetching mountains that run down
its eastern flank, Australia has been all but silent geologically.
In consequence, things, once created, have tended just to lie there.
So many of the oldest objects ever found on earth--the most ancient
rocks and fossils, the earliest animal tracks and riverbeds, the
first faint signs of life itself--have come from Australia.
At some undetermined point in the great immensity of its past--perhaps
45,000 years ago, perhaps 60,000, but certainly before there were
modern humans in the Americas or Europe--it was quietly invaded
by a deeply inscrutable people, the Aborigines, who have no clearly
evident racial or linguistic kinship to their neighbors in the region,
and whose presence in Australia can only be explained by positing
that they invented and mastered ocean-going craft at least 30,000
years in advance of anyone else, in order to undertake an exodus,
then forgot or abandoned nearly all that they had learned and scarcely
ever bothered with the open sea again.
It is an accomplishment so singular and extraordinary, so uncomfortable
with scrutiny, that most histories breeze over it in a paragraph
or two, then move on to the second, more explicable invasion--the
one that begins with the arrival of Captain James Cook and his doughty
little ship HMS Endeavour in Botany Bay in 1770. Never mind that
Captain Cook didn't discover Australia and that he wasn't even yet
a captain at the time of his visit. For most people, including most
Australians, this is where the story begins.
The world those first Englishmen found was famously inverted--its
seasons back to front, its constellations upside down--and unlike
anything any of them had seen before even in the near latitudes
of the Pacific. Its creatures seemed to have evolved as if they
had misread the manual. The most characteristic of them didn't run
or lope or canter, but bounced across the landscape, like dropped
balls. The continent teemed with unlikely life. It contained a fish
that could climb trees; a fox that flew (it was actually a very
large bat); crustaceans so large that a grown man could climb inside
their shells.
In short, there was no place in the world like it. There still isn't.
Eighty percent of all that lives in Australia, plant and animal,
exists nowhere else. More than this, it exists in an abundance that
seems incompatible with the harshness of the environment. Australia
is the driest, flattest, hottest, most desiccated infertile, and
climatically aggressive of all the inhabited continents. (Only Antarctica
is more hostile to life.) This is a place so inert that even the
soil is, technically speaking, a fossil. And yet it teems with life
in numbers uncounted. For insects alone, scientists haven't the
faintest idea whether the total number of species is 100,000 or
more than twice that. As many as a third of those species remain
entirely unknown to science. For spiders, the proportion rises to
80 percent. [Bill Bryson: In a Sunburned Country, pp. 6-7] |
| ************************* |
We
walk together on sacred ground. Black feet, white feet, footprints,
footprints, soft upon the land.
The Tjukurpa* moves beneath our feet.
The landscape is alive
Anon.
*Pitjantjatjara
word for Dreaming |
Aborigenes'
relationship to the land Aboriginal
people respect the land and engage in an ongoing relationship with
their environment, which in turn provides "evidence of their
origins, a basis for the rules of life and an avenue through which
they pursue their customs and traditional way of life." Sometimes
communities would move around quite large regions according to the
seasons and sometimes areas might be available for common use at these
times.
Land itself was "owned" by a family group because it was
the territory of their ancestors. Land could never be sold or traded.
Land and the resources that it contained represented a sacred bequest
from the Ancestral Beings and the Dreaming. Land was not there to
be used without regard for the environment and it was considered very
important to ensure that resources were not depleted to a point where
they could not be replenished.
Land represents the mainspring of the psyche and well-being of the
people who inhabit a certain territory. Communities and individuals
are still directly responsible for the protection of the land under
their guardianship. This responsibility or custodianship forms the
basis of much of the conflict that continues to exist between Aborigines
and those who operate in a way that abuses the sacred obligations
placed on those who inhabit the land.
Significant conflict has erupted over the two hundred years of white
settlement with regard to mining operations. Clashes have occurred
(and in some cases are still occurring) at Noonkanbah and Yirrkala,
and at Kakadu National Park, the traditional land of the Mirrar people
where the Jabiluka uranium mine is located. The concerns are manifold
but in particular relate to drilling of the area and to the degradation
of creeks or rivers as a result of the mining process. In some cases,
mining companies shave worked cooperatively with Aboriginal communities.
Agreement has been reached on the most appropriate places to mine,
the benefits to be gained form profits made, and the potential for
training programs which might be put in place for Aboriginal people
as a result of the operation.
Drilling or excavating on a sacred site not only violates the spirit
of the Dreaming Ancestor who lives there, but also brings shame to
the custodians of the site who have been charged with the responsibility
to protect it from harm. The particular relationship with parts of
the land: the trees, rocks, flora and fauna, is something that is
clearly understood by Aborigines from a very early age, and they are
very much aware of their individual and family responsibilities. [Pieta
O'Shaughnessy, A Traveller's Guide to Aboriginal Australia] |
| |
| ************************* |
Beyond
the fringe of the known country
When the first white men pushed out into that country from the fringe
of the known country, each man took his life in his hands; and they
knew it.. There was some danger from blacks--not a very great danger.
The real danger was from the country itself. The white men--Burke
and Wills and others--went provided against that danger, with stock
and water-bags and provisions, even with camels. And then, with it
all, sometimes those men gave out and died.
One has seen the country where men have died; and if the place had
not actually done men to death, one would not have dreamed that there
could be any cruelty in the heart of it. There were no Alpine precipices
no avalanches or volcanoes or black jungles full of wild beasts, no
earthquakes, not even a flood or a bushfire. The countryside looked
like a beautiful open park, with gentle slopes and soft grey tree
clumps. Nothing appalling or horrible rushed upon these men. Only
there happened--nothing. There might have been a pool of cool water
behind any one of those tree clumps; only--there was not. It might
have rained any time; only--it did not. There might have been a fence
or a house just over the next rise; only--there was not. They lay
down with the birds hopping from branch to branch above them and the
bright sky peeping down at them. No one came. Nothing happened. That
was all. [C.E.W. Bean, On the Wool Track, 1916, p. 19] |
| ************************* |
| [T]he
paper this morning--January 31, 1910--contains the following message.
It was
sent along the wires by one of a party who were making for the Tanami
gold-field--which is a particularly distant and desolate corner. "Failed
to reach field via Treuer Ranges, got out sixty miles, driven
back, no water. Terribly hot, all native wells and holes
dried up. Frayne (leader) perished while trying to locate water. Made
back to line at Barrow Creek. I had to leave loading and ride on,
perishing. As a last resource, cut wires and worked north, hoping
to meet linesman for repairs. Got water on the road. Further particulars
next station." [C.E.W. Bean, On the Wool Track, 1916,
p. 19] |
| ************************* |
| The
threat of invasion [during WWII]...[brought] Australia--the
land itself--fully alive at last in our consciousness. As
a part of the earth of which we were now the custodians. As soil to
be defended and preserved because we were deeply connected to it.
As the one place where we were properly at home, the one place to
which we were related in an interior way by daily experience, and,
as Vance Palmer put it, through love and imagination, and which related
us, in a way we were just beginning to grasp, to those for whom the
land of Australia had always been this: the people we thought we had
dispossessed but who had always "owned" the place in a way
we were just beginning to appreciate. [David Malouf:"Made in
England: Australia's British Inheritance," Quarterly Essay,
p. 56] |
| Natural
Environment--New Zealand |
Importance
of Landscape
As Janet Frame observed, "Nature is never out of fashion."
The importance of landscape in New Zealand literature reflects its
importance in the wider culture--in painting, photography, film,
advertising, tourism and more recently the campaigns of the conservation
movement. ...
Not
surprisingly the concern with landscape begins in New Zealand's
colonial experience--a determined engagement with the original ecology
and landforms, an impossible conflict between eighteenth-century
aesthetic conventions and the muddy realities of the new land. Contemporary
colonists' accounts...share an overwhelming sense of alienation
from the indigenous landscape. Despite the glowing publicity encouraging
emigration, despite occasional vague resemblances to the landscapes
of "Home," nature in New Zealand was wild, primeval and
unnervingly evergreen, "dreary and desolate," "gloomy
forest and repulsive rugged waste." ...
From
1872, New Zealand writers relied on the Sublime as a way of accommodating
and managing the magnitude the sheer drama of the scenery--especially
the Southern mountains and the dense bush. Human frailty and insignificance
are invariably emphasised.... New Zealand's wild country became
the essential setting for the epic journeys of numerous "Man
Alone" heroes, rugged figures proving their own sublimity in
relation to hostile landscapes. The pattern form Women Alone in
such alien scenery tends to be less heroic...[women are shown to
be] victims of the landscape and its alienness, destroyed by isolation
and hardship and the "savage spirit of the country [that] sneers
at what it sees." ...
The principle colonial enterprise of taming the recalcitrant landscape
soon became a powerful literary theme. The metamorphosis of landscape
into countryside allows writers both to celebrate the settlers'
noble enterprise and to employ the more optimistic literary conventions
of the Pastoral and the Picturesque. ... Tough farmer-heroes soon
establish themselves in the literature as a quintessential Kiwi
archetype, laconic, stoical, struggling for a living and for a sense
of identity on the land. ...
Wild
landscapes have always...been a means for New Zealand writers to
connect with the eternal and the elemental, with fundamental universal
forces....For many writers landscape can be a means of access to
larger personal and spiritual dimensions, the forces of history
and ancestry. In Maori traditional oral literature, and in the work
of contemporary maori writers, the natural landscape is inextricable
from questions of spirituality and identity. ...The bonds between
maori and the land are visceral, inescapable, centrally to the whakapapa
(genealogy) of each individual and the iwi (tribe), essential for
maintaining mauri (the spiritual energies) of each person and thing.
["Landscape," The Oxford Companion to New Zealand
Literature, pp. 296-298] |
| ************************* |
| The
woods were nearby. A beautiful river was always nearby. No matter
how urban a place was, it was never very far away from something that
felt more or less primeval. [Viggo Mortensen, Aragorn
in Lord of the Rings] |
| ************************* |
| [T]his
country has plants and animals that have evolved uniquely
for the millions of years since we separated from Gondwana. ... [N]atural
New Zealand can be described as the place on earth most akin to life
on another planet. ... Here, large flightless birds like the kiwi,
kakapo and the now extinct moa evolved, filling the niches usually
occupied by mammals. Giant weta stepped, antennae swaying, into the
niche taken elsewhere by mice. But because of the introduction of
mammalian predators, and a long legacy of habitat destruction by both
Maori and European, those keystone species that have survived are
in such low numbers that both birds and their habitat survive beneath
a terrible question mark. Extinction of species has become a dismal
phantom of our landscape, mainly because our unique flora and fauna
have no mechanisms for dealing with invaders brought by both Maori
and Pakeha. [David Young: New Zealand: Land and People, p.
11] |
|
|