Literature
In examining the
interactions of the early settlers and immigrants in the Northfield
area
with the nature they encountered literature dealing with settlement in
general, environmental history, a sense of place, impacts of different
groups on the land, and different movements of thought are important.
Settlement
patterns
occur in some areas and among certain groups of people but there are
exceptions
in every case. In looking at settlement in the
Northfield
area looking at it in a greater context of settlement overall adds a
wholeness
to the picture. Most events of settlement are not
disconnected from others. They link through chains
of events that often happen over wide territories in the U.S. as the
tide
of people move westward (Stilgoe, 339-349).
Settlement
into
the west opened up as the States in the east began to become
overcrowded
and also as it became profitable for land surveyors to sell land
(Holton, 3-6). The
Railroad and cities like Chicago would provide gateways into western
lands
such as Minnesota (Cronon,292-307). Along the way battles
would be fought between Native Americans and settlers, treaties signed
sometimes under duress, and territories established that would later
become
states.
Settlement has also been
examined
in Environmental history. Settlement is inextricably
linked to the land it occurs on. Landscapes are
transformed
as fences, houses, towns, and farms appear on the land. Often
vegetation changes as patches are cleared and new plants grown.
Domesticated
animals also changed the face of the land. These
changes
are all linked to the cultural ideas that people hold about land and
its
value (Warren, 74-79). This can also
be linked to why people chose certain places to settle over others.
Looking at the question of
how people new to a
place connect to their new home is an important one in settlement and
immigration
history. It is something that all immigrants
throughout
time have had to deal with. Learning to adapt to
their
new life and new land. Often learning to love or
at
least have an understanding of the place they now inhabit and often
changing it based on values and ideas they bring with them (Stilgoe,
3-11). Looking
at what a sense of place entails helps to unravel the story of how
settlers connected to the land and
gained a sense of place in their new homes or if they were in fact able
to. In some cases it appears that those who did
not
were often unsuccessful in their venture. It
appears
then that developing a sense of place could have been an important part
of the
settlement
process. Because a sense of place usually involves knowing a
place and for settlers to learn how to live in new worlds this kind of
understanding was important. People would do this in different
ways
and
sometimes it would include a drastic transformation of the new land
they
lived in (Warren, 74-79).
Looking at the actual impact
that settlers had on
the land helps illustrate ways they viewed the land and connected to
it. It
also in some ways can show how they developed a sense of place.
For
some settlers trying to create their old homeland in the new one would
help them to bond to their new home. It would
often
combine pieces of the old with the new and create something different
than
either of them. There were often ideas of improvement such as the
application of the grid to order land, which was applied not by
settlers but by surveyors. It would still shape the view of the
way land was supposed to be (Stilgoe, 99-107).
Impacts
on the land are also often connected with social and cultural ideas
about
land and where people fit in it (Stilgoe, 344-345). During this
time
of settlement there were boosters promoting the usefulness of land,
ideas
of progress with the railroad improving transportation, and the
generation
of waterpower were also abundant. There were also
ideas of thrift, in getting land for as cheap as you could by getting
there
before the surveyors who would charge you more. These trends can
be found in other stories of other places such as historian William
Cronon's Nature's Metropolis, where he explores these same
issues. These ideas connect with how people connect to a place.
In the
chapter Dwellers in the land Sale discusses some parts of a sense
of place that I think were important for early settlers. These
including knowing the land, learning the lore, and developing the
potential (in the constraints of ecology). These all appear to be
things that most of the settlers in the study area of the project were
able to do, except for them their were no constraints of ecology
because
at that time ecology was not part of the thought climate. Even
today when we do have an understanding of ecology it is hard to define
what the constraints are. This is not to say that having
ecological principles are unhelpful, but that in struggling in our own
definitions of ecology we can begin to see how hard it would have been
for early settlers to grapple with such questions and define their
sense of place in such a way. As is often the case a sense of
place is a complex thing and sometimes can only be understood by the
person who experiences it and often everyone's experiences are
different.
This presents big challenges in trying to understand how people in the
past experienced or did not experience such a thing. Ways to get
around this include analyzing general experiences, individual actions,
or if you lucky reading it in their own words to get general sense of
what they really experienced. All this project can offer is a
glimpse at what these early settlers might have experienced in
settlement and in a sense of place. Conclusions
|