Sources

Home
Literature Review
Research
Conclusions
Sources
Additional Resources

Aventis: Why Aventis? GE Briefing Series (2001). Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/publications/GEBriefings/aventis1.html.

Beeby, Alex. Personal Interview. April 18, 2005.

Bernauer, Thomas and Erika Meins (Nov. 2001). Scientific revolution meets policy and the market: Explaining cross-national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation. CIES Discussion Paper No. 0144. Available on the World Wide Web: http://ssrn.com/abstract=295481.

Block, Daniel R. (2002). Protecting and connecting: Separation, connection, and the U.S. dairy economy. Journal for the Study of Food and Society, vol. 6, no. 1: 22-30.

Carlsson, Fredrik, Peter Frykblom, and Carl-Johan Lagerkvist (2004). Consumer Benefits of labels and bans on genetically modified food- An empirical analysis using Choice Experiments. Göteborg, Department of Economics.

Caswell, Julie A. (2000). Analyzing quality and quality assurance (including labeling) for GMOs. AgBioForum 3 no. 4: 225-230.

Caswell, Julie A. (2000). Labeling GMOs in food: Trojan horse or good policy? AgBiotechNet, vol. 2 Nov.

Closson, Glenda. Personal Interview. May 9, 2005.

Conner, David S. (2004). Expressing values in agricultural markets: An economic policy perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 21: 27-35.

Crespi, John M. and Stephan Marette (Nov. 2003). Some economic implications of public labeling. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 34: 84-93.

Dixon, Jane (1999). A cultural economy model for studying food systems. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 151-160.

Duffy, Michael (2005). Study shows no economic advantage for Iowa farmers to plant GMO crops. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/nwl/2001/2001-4-leoletter/gmo.htm.

DuPuis, E. Melanie (2000). Not in my body: rBGH and the rise of organic milk. Agriculture and Human Values, 17: 285-295.

FDA (1994): Biotechnology of Food. Washington: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

Ferber, Dan (2004). Modified Plants May Need Less Nitrogen. Science News.

Food for thought: Why mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods is unnecessary + A plan for postsecondary education funding that makes the grade (Sept. 9, 2003). Canadian Business, vol. 76, issue 18: 96.

Fraser, David (2001). Farm Animal Production: Changing agriculture in a changing culture. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4 no.3: 175-190.

Frequently Asked Questions: US Regulatory Process. United States Regulatory Agencies Unified Biotechnology Website. Available on the World Wide Web: http://usbiotechreg.nbii.gov/FAQAll.asp.

Harder, Ben (2003). To contain gene-altered crops, nip the in the seed. Science News, 163 no. 22.

Hoban, Thomas J. (1998). Trends in consumer attitudes about agricultural biotechnology. AgBioForm, 1 no.1: 3-7.

Huffman, Wallace E., Matthew Rousu, Jason F. Shogren, and Abebayehu Tegene (2003). Consumers' resistance to genetically modified foods in high income countries: the role of information in an uncertain environment. D. Gale Johnson Lecture: Topic II. University of Chicago. April 25, 2003.

Ingram, Mrill (2002). Creating credible edibles: The organic agriculture movement and the emergence of U.S. federal organic standards. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.seweb.uci.edu/users/jenness/ingram.pdf.

Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas (2004). Regulating Biotechnology: GM Food Labels. Biotechnology Science and Society at a Crossroad, National Agricultural Biotechnology Consortium Proceedings, Cornell University.

Leading natural food brands test positive for GE contamination. Organic Consumers Association. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030702/03.

Marks, L.A., N. Kalaitzandonakes, and L. Zakharova (2002). Will biotech foods finish the ride? Choices, 2002 (Spring), 6-10.

Marshall, Andrew (2000). Sustaining sustainable agriculture: The rise and fall of the Fund for Rural America. Agriculture and Human Values, 17: 267-277.

Meenakshi, Ganguly (2002). Seeds of self-reliance. Time Europe, 160 no. 10.

Miller, Beth ( 2001). Laboratory tests belie promises of some 'GMO-free' food labels. The Wall Street Journal. April 5, 2001. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.nutiva.com/about/media/2001_04_05.php.

Miller, Henry I. (1999). A rational approach to labeling biotech-derived foods. American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Minar, David. Personal Interview. April 25, 2005.

Miraglia, M., K.G. Berdal, C. Brera, P. Corbisier, A. Holst-Jensen, E.J. Kok, H.J.P. Marvin, H. Schimmel, J. Rentsch, J.P.P.F. van Rie, J. Zagon. Detection and traceablility of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain (July 2004). Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 42, issue 7: 1157-1180.

Moore, Elizabeth (2000). Science, internationalization, and policy networks regulating genetically-engineered food crops in Canada and the United States. Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Copenhagen.

Organic Consumers Association. rBGH consumer warning. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.organicconsumers.org/text5.html.

Pinstrup-Andersen, Per and Marc J. Cohen. Modern biotechnology for food and agriculture: Risks and opportunities for the poor. Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor 159-169. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.cgiar.org/biotech/rep0100/Ppanders.pdf.

Pollan, Michael (2001). The Botany of Desire: A plant's eye view of the world. New York: Random House. Pp: 183-238.

Raab, Carolyn and Deana Grobe (2003). Labeling genetically engineered food: the consumer’s right to know? AgBioForum, 6 no. 4: 155-161.

Runge, C. Ford, and Lee Ann Jackson (2000). Negative labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The experience of rBST. AgBioForum, 3 no. 1: 58-62.

Ruse, David and Michael Ruse (2002). Genetically modified foods: debating technology. New York: Prometheus Books.

Scott, Andrew (2003). EU Parliament OKs GMO rules: Move may be a step toward resolving US-EU trade disputes, but true resolution is some way off. The Scientist. July 2003. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030702/03.

Shareholders applaud Whole Foods decision to label in-house foods as GE-free or not. Organic Consumers Association. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/wholefoods040705.cfm.

Smith, J. W., and L. O. Ely (1996). Effect of bovine somatotropin on milk production of Holstein cows on a commercial dairy farm. UGA Animal and Dairy Science: Annual Report: pp 196-198. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.ads.uga.edu/annrpt/1996/96_196.htm.

State of Oregon. (2002). Measure No. 27 (voters pamphlet). Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov52002/guide/measures/m27.

Teisl, Mario F., Lynn Halverson, Kelly O’Brien, Brian Roe, Nancy Ross, and Mike Vayda (2002). Focus group reactions to genetically modified food labels. AgBioForum, 5 no. 1: 6-9.

Victor, David G. and C. Ford Runge (2002). Farming the genetic frontier. Foreign Affairs, 81 no. 3, May/ June.

Vos, Timothy (2000). Visions of the middle landscape: Organic farming and the politics of nature. Agriculture and Human Values, 17: 245-256.

Weise, Elizabeth (2003). European law requires labels on biotech foods: U.S. farmers may face a barrier of red tape. USA Today July 3.

What does 'GMO-free' on food labels really mean? (2001). Environmental Nutrition, July 2001, vol. 24, issue 6: 7.

 

All photographs taken by the author, Sarah Roach.
(The Minnesota Grown picture on the research homepage was a photograph taken of a sign, and the Cedar Summit logo on the Farmers homepage was a photograph of a T-shirt).

Sarah Roach
Environmental Studies Senior Capstone
, St. Olaf College, 2005