Honor System

[Faculty Handbook Category #2]

 “I pledge my honor that during this examination I have neither given nor received assistance, and that I have seen no dishonest work.”

 

The Honor System at St. Olaf College, initiated in 1911, is an agreement between the faculty and the students.  The faculty agrees to leave the responsibility for proper and honest conduct during written examinations in the hands of the students.  The students in turn agree to accept this responsibility.  As an indication of such proper and honest conduct, the students shall consider the pledge printed above.  Failure to sign the pledge shall indicate that, in the student's opinion, the Honor System may have been violated during the examination.

The following statements outline the basic policies of the Honor System.

1.      Every examination is given under the Honor System.  This includes all short quizzes and lab tests.  If the nature of the examination is such that the instructor must remain in the classroom during the exam, each student is still on his/her honor and the Honor System is still in effect.  In such cases, the instructor should explain to his/her students that he/she is acting as an administrator and not as a proctor.

2.      The Honor System is violated whenever information that results in, or could result in, an unfair advantage for one or more students is given or received before, during, or after an examination.

3.      The Honor Council strongly recommends that the entire printed pledge, and not just the word “pledge,” be on the last page of examination papers when the exam is handed out.  There also must be the phrase “I have intentionally not signed the pledge.  __ (Check only if appropriate.)”

4.      It is the responsibility of the instructor to remind students verbally of the pledge before an examination.  A visual reminder should be placed at the front of the room as well.

5.      If the instructor asks the students to spread out during an exam, the Honor Council recommends that the instructor make it clear that the reason is to remove cause for suspicion.

6.      The Honor Council suggests that a blank sheet of paper be placed on top of lab examinations.

7.      It is the instructor’s responsibility to check for unsigned pledges immediately after an examination.  If a pledge is not signed, the instructor may discretely and confidentially ask the student if the missing signature was an oversight.  If an unsigned pledge is the result of an oversight, the instructor may proceed as though the pledge had been signed.  If the absence of a signature is intentional, the instructor must immediately turn the exam over to the Honor Council.  The instructor’s investigation is limited to ascertaining whether the student intended to sign the pledge.  The instructor should not investigate the nature of any possible violation of the Honor System.  If the instructor chooses not to inquire about an unsigned pledge, the exam must be treated as if the failure to sign the pledge was intentional. 

8.      The instructor should bring examinations with unsigned pledges to the Office of the Dean of Students as soon as possible.  It is imperative that exams not be sent via campus mail or handled by students.

9.      A suspected violation of the Honor System can be reported by means other than an unsigned pledge.  A faculty member, or a student not in a position to indicate his/her suspicions in this way, may submit a direct report to the Honor Council at the Office of the Dean of Students.

10.  Under no circumstances is the professor to return examinations when some are still out due to unsigned pledges.

11.  Take-home examinations may be given under the condition that regulations for what may or may not be used on the exam are explicitly stated on the examination form.  Professors are encouraged to require that students hand in all of their work along with their exams.

12.  Faculty members are encouraged to keep a seating chart or practice some other method designed to record the location of each student during an examination.

13.  In most cases a student can plan in advance to take an examination with the rest of his/her class.  The Honor Council strongly feels that make-up exams should not be given unless absolutely necessary, as in the case of real illness.  The Honor Council recommends that such make-up exams be given at a specific time and place and that they not be distributed to students via P.O. boxes.

14.  A student implicated in a possible violation of the Honor System is considered innocent until proven otherwise.

15.  Since a violation of the Honor System is considered very serious, there is no warning for a first offense.  Penalties are assessed according to the circumstances of the individual case and are more severe in instances of multiple violations.  Standard penalties vary from an “F” or a zero on the examination in which the violation occurred to failure in the course.  In particularly egregious cases, the Honor Council may recommend to the Dean of Students Office that a student be suspended or expelled; the final responsibility for such decisions rests with the administration of the college.  Under certain circumstances, the Dean of Students Office may recommend that a student found to have violated the Honor System receive counseling.

16.  A student who is assessed a penalty of failure in the course for violation of the Honor System is not permitted to drop the course in question.

 

Questions regarding the Honor System should be directed to the President of the Honor Council, who can be contacted through the Dean of Students Office.