Producing Team Players
"Articulating, Coordinating, Communicating" was the subject of a
Roundtable held on February 15 at Seattle Central Community College to
provide a forum for discussion among educators and employers. Issues
that emerged in this discussion are summarized in the following report.
Statements from some of the participants are given in subsequent
sections.
Mathematics, not surprisingly, means different things to different
people.
- To the public, mathematics means "problems on a page" or "scores on
a test." One participant characterized this as an "emaciated" view of
mathematics.
- To many teachers, mathematics means "mathematical power" as
expressed in the NCTM Standards--a robust mixture of problem solving,
communication, and reasoning.
- To employers, mathematics is just part of the teamwork required for
employees to do their jobs well. "In today's workplace, communicating
ideas is far more important than applying technical skills."
With Fear and Trembling
School mathematics is the mathematics we love to hate: rote memorization,
mindless procedures, timed tests. Fear of mathematics is widespread,
especially among politicians and managers whose backgrounds are not in
science or engineering. "They turn pale when I come with my graphs and
charts. Quantitative arguments strike terror in their hearts. Their
cognitive processes just shut off." No wonder the self-help book
"Everyday Math for Dummies" is a best seller.
This widespread fear poses significant challenges for the mathematical
community. Mathematics educators need to help
students learn to communicate about mathematical ideas with those for
whom quantitative thinking is not a welcome mode of discourse.
Students' future jobs will likely depend on their skill in this
endeavor.
At the same time, mathematicians and mathematics educators themselves
need to communicate to the public that mathematics is not really as they
imagine it in their terror-filled dreams. The world is changing, and so is
mathematics--both at work and in school.
Mathematics at Work
To illustrate the "new math" of the workplace, several participants gave
examples of ways in which they see mathematical thinking used in their
business:
- To develop a plan to sterilize laboratory equipment in an autoclave, a
worker must gather and organize sufficient information to convince various
supervisors and review boards that the
plan is defensible. This requires analysis of data to prove that the plan
will work, discussion of alternatives to be sure that nothing less costly
would do the job, consideration of extreme cases that may not fit the
typical scenario, and responsiveness to relevant safety regulations.
- To reconcile inconsistencies in monthly inventories, a worker needs to
think backwards to determine all the possible ways in which records might
be wrong or items misplaced. This requires the ability to imagine the
workings of a complex system, to identify plausible sources of error or
failure, and to consult with various individuals in order to gather ideas and
confirm (or refute) hunches.
- To design an airplane in a modern competitive economy, one needs
more than the traditional airfoil analysis that produces optimal lift for the
wings. Now one seeks to minimize not only fuel consumption, but also
manufacturing costs: for a given lift, which design of an airfoil is cheapest
to manufacture? To answer that question requires the combined skills of
construction workers, design engineers, financial experts, and senior
management.
These problems illustrate several features of modern problem solving that
are rarely addressed or developed in the schools For example, individuals
are expected to recognize weaknesses in their own
analysis of a problem, and then to seek assistance from their team (or their
supervisors) in addressing these weaknesses. The habit of volunteering
possible flaws in an argument does not come naturally to students who
have become habituated by the pressure for grades to living in a world
of bluff and desperation.
Whether in retail or manufacturing, finance or health, students who enter
the world of work must be prepared to put forth their ideas and then to
work with others to improve on these initial thoughts.
School only prepares students to answer questions posed by others.
Instead, students need to learn to say: "Here's my idea. Where are the
holes?"
Mathematics in School
Mathematics in school is also changing. Reformers argue that children's
motivation to learn arises from rich problem-solving contexts, not from
isolated drill on basic skills. Effective teachers no longer make
memorization of times-tables "the measure of a child's worth in
mathematics." We now know that very young children can understand
and solve problems involving simple multiplication and division well before
they have the maturity to learn all their arithmetic facts.
Yet the public, and many employers, still emphasize acquisition of basic
skills and scores on standardized tests. Many believe that mastery of
basic skills is a prerequisite to higher order problem solving, and that
calculators provide young children with an excuse for not mastering these
basic skills. "You must first master fundamentals, or little else can be
accomplished."
Because test scores are the public surrogate for mathematical
achievement, the basic skills monitored by these tests become a bellwether
for public support of mathematics education. "If we don't satisfy the
public that students' basic skills are OK, then they will not trust us
with the changes we want to make in other parts of the curriculum." The
issue is not whether students should learn basic skills, but
when and how. Are they best learned in context, in parallel
with higher order problems, or in specific units to be mastered before
moving on?
Although nearly everyone agrees on the fundamental skills of elementary
school mathematics, there is not much agreement among teachers, parents,
employers, and others concerning the "basic skills" of high school
mathematics. How important is it, really, that every citizen be able to
use the quadratic formula, or factor algebraic expressions? Many
believe that what really matters about school mathematics are not specific
facts or procedures but experience in working with patterns, in
thinking logically, in recognizing that the order of operations
matters.
Developing Teamwork
Competition and litigation now compel industry towards
higher standards of reliability and efficiency. So employees need strong
analytical skills. But they also need more than experience at solving
problems on paper. They need experience working in teams.
If employees are to solve the kinds of problems they face every day at
work, they need to recognize that all input is valuable. Asking questions
and challenging orthodoxy is often an individual's most important
contribution to the group. Those who can only see their own viewpoints,
or who put others down, tend to destroy creativity and cancel the benefits
of the group. Unfortunately, this strong commitment to individual
performance is all too often a correlate of high achievement in school
mathematics.
There are several compelling reasons that the study of mathematics
highlights individual effort over teamwork. First, major parts of school
mathematics (routine problems) do not require or benefit much from group
work. Other parts (complex projects) that are more suited to teamwork
account for only a small portion of the curriculum. Second, students and
their parents know that college admission is based on individual effort,
including SAT scores, course grades, and writing samples. Parents want
high schools to focus on preparation for college, and are thus very
nervous about highlighting teamwork as a priority. Third, and ironically,
assessing an applicant's potential as a team member is often not a
priority in business hiring practices. "People who may do a good job as
part of a team may have difficulty getting in the front door."
Nonetheless, employers stressed that teamwork produces a synergy not
possible from individual effort. "I expect team solutions. People have
different skills, and contribute differently to a team. Educators too
often force all students in to the same mold. The era of the lone gunman
is over."
To add your voice to this discussion, e-mail comments, letters, and op-ed
articles to: extend@stolaf.edu or click here
if your Web browser is set up for e-mail.
| Home Page |
Previous Page |
Topic Page |
Next Page |
Next Topic |
Contents
|
Last Update: 03/26/96