Home

Alphabetic Chronological Legal Area Product

Full Text/Search

Key Statutes Glossary Links AntiTrust.Org

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Syllabus

346 U.S. 61

AUTOMATIC CANTEEN COMPANY OF AMERICA v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 89. Argued December 12, 15, 1952. -- Decided June 8, 1953.

Section 2 (f) of the Robinson-Patman Act makes it unlawful for anyone engaged in interstate commerce "knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited" by the Act, but the Act does not prohibit a price differential which makes only due allowance for cost differences. The Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint charging violation of 2 (f) by petitioner, a large buyer of candy and confections for resale through automatic vending machines operated in many States. At the hearing, the Commission introduced evidence that petitioner received, and in some instances solicited, prices that petitioner knew were as much as 33% lower than the prices to other buyers. Petitioner's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Commission had not made a prima facie case was denied; and, on petitioner's failure to introduce evidence, the Commission entered a cease and desist order.

Held:

1. A buyer does not violate 2 (f) if the lower prices he induces are either within one of the seller's defenses, such as the cost justification, or not known by him not to be within one of those defenses. Pp. 69-74.

2. Proof that the buyer knew that the price he induced or received was lower than that offered other buyers is not sufficient to shift to the buyer the burden of introducing evidence to show justification. Pp. 74-81.

194 F.2d 433, reversed.

In a proceeding against petitioner under 2 (f) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. 13, the Federal Trade Commission entered a cease and desist order. 46 F. T. C. 861. On a petition for review, the Court of Appeals affirmed. 194 F.2d 433. This Court granted certiorari. 344 U.S. 809. Reversed and remanded, p. 82.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.


All graphics and HTML are copyright Anthony D. Becker 1994-2004.

Disclaimer