|
The Psychology of Good and EvilPsychology 391 (most days are done, but still, anything might change) |
|---|
| |
M,W,F |
current as of 4/28/2011 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| Frans De Waal | |
Plus many readings of current
psychological articles (see selections for each day) and of online classics (like Augustine, etc.). |
|
Welcome to the first Ethics class in the Psychology curriculum. This is the course I feel like I have been reading for most of my career. That means I am constantly changing my mind about what the course ought to be about and updating it to reflect the most recent work in the field. Thus, unlike the social psychology course (which is probably 3-5 years behind the cutting edge) or the intro course (which is sometime 10 years behind the cutting edge) this course in some ways defines the cutting edge of the field. This is most true for the 2011 offering: you will be looking at early drafts of a book that will (we hope) summarize the field..
So what is the field about? It is about what the emotions have to do with morals, how vengence works, why moral heroes think they have no choice, how our evolutionary heritage affects our moral judgments and action, how religious claims about morality can be reconciled with empirical claims, and a hundred other puzzles we will try to outline together.
There will be three types of reading for this course: philosophical, religious, and psychological. You will be reading classic and contemporary philosophy (mostly excerpts and short articles) to understand how people have thought about what it means to live a moral life. You will be reading some religious texts (mostly Christian, but some Muslim and I hope other approaches) to see how religion influences moral thought and action. But mostly you will be reading recent empirical and theoretical psychology. I hope to make all the readings available from electronic texts or in PDFs or other forms.
It will be to your advantage to do the reading for the assigned day. First, this will mean you will be able to follow the discussion for the day. Secondly, it means you will be able to write the daily papers.
There will be daily reaction papers for the readings. This means you will need actually to read them and to reflect on them. These should be sent to me in email the night before class and should be no more than a 1/2 screen or so of text. I will read them in the morning before class. Sometimes I get up at 5:30, so your responses should be in by this time. This is you chance to ask me a question that might help set the agenda for class that day, or just to get something clarified. Comments, reflections, worries about the implications of an idea, applications to some area, are all useful things to mail to me.
These are graded simply as 1 or 0. A reasonable email with a question or comment is a 1. Not getting the email to me on time or putting nothing of consequence in it is a 0
When we are doing student-assigned reading, I will forward your comments on to the student leaders for the discussion so they can see what people are thinking about the reading. I will drop the lowest two grades for these papers and so you can decide to skip two (or do them all to make sure you can get the best grade). Late email comments will not be accepted.
Final papers are due on the day of the final. They will be review papers based on our negotiation of the topic you will focus on. These are to be in APA style and no more than 15 pages of the body of text, excluding front matter, references, tables, etc. They should connect your topic to at least two other topcs on the syllabus, and should contain references to original empirical work, to theoretical reviews, and to normative work.
These papers should be done individually, but with at least one reading of a real first draft by another student. In the Author Notes section on the title page, your paper should contain acknowledgments to other students who critiqued the manuscript.
The final exam will be an in class, laptop-based exam based on a set of basic questions with whose answers you should be familiar by the end of the class. I will draw three to five (3 - 5) questions from this set of questions for the final exam.. You will be allowed to bring a note sheet to the final exam. This sheet should consist of a set of 10 words or less for each potential question, to remind you of your answer to that question. Each answer should be between no more than 300 words in length, citations and restating the question not included. Use APA style in-text citations; these do not count in the word count.
Because I hope to discover new and interesting things in this class, I reserve the right to add to or modify the list of basic questions for the exam, but I will do my best to keep the number of items about the same.
Most of the last half of the class will involve students leading discussions of literature in their area of focus. These presentations should be done in groups of 2-3 people. These are not presentations of your knowledge in the area but instead focussed discussions based on one or two articles you have chosen to be read by the class (and provided an electronic copy with sufficient advance notice). The purpose of the discusion is to
Note that we must do the first item well in order to attempt the other two. I will have a grading rubric available for the presentations. Your grade will be based on your presentation and discussion leadership and on an annotated bibliography you prepare of background materials in your area.
| Choose This Column |
Percent Grade |
Or Choose This Column |
Percent Grade |
Daily Papers |
15 |
Daily Papers | 15 |
| Final Papers |
35 |
Final Papers | 30 |
| Class Presentations |
20 |
Class Presentation | 20 |
| Final Exam |
30 |
Annotated Bib | 10 |
| Final Exam | 25 |
If you have a documented disability that will impact your work in this class, please contact me to discuss your needs. Additionally, you will need to register with Student Disability Services. All such discussions will be confidential.
Date |
Assignment |
Readings |
|
Feb, Mon |
7
|
Overview of the field & class |
|
9
|
Plato, Aristotle. Mencius |
Introduction to Plato's Republic and the Notes; Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics ( Book 1: 1-5,7a, 7b, all Book 2); Chan on Mencius |
|
|
11
|
Hume |
|
Mon |
14
|
Deontological Ethics |
Kant: Selections from Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. |
16
|
Kohlberg |
Narvaez on neo-Kohlberg |
|
18
|
Evolution |
DeWaal essay in text |
|
| Mon | 21 |
Humean Primates |
Kitcher in text |
23
|
Kantian Primates |
Korsgaard in text |
|
25
|
Evolution Summary |
Huff's Fence Sitting |
|
| Mon | 28
|
Feeling I |
Haidt's Dog |
| March | 2
|
Feeling II |
|
4
|
Huff @ Ethics Conference |
||
| Mon | 7
|
Feeling III |
|
9
|
Thinking I |
||
| Mon | 11
|
Thinking II |
|
14
|
Thinking III |
||
16 |
Personality I |
||
18 |
Personality II |
||
| Mon | 21
|
Spring Break |
|
23
|
Spring Break |
||
25
|
Spring Break |
||
| Mon | 28 |
Religion I |
|
30 |
Religion II |
||
| April | 1 |
Moral Ecology I |
|
| Nov | 4 |
Moral Ecology II |
|
6
|
Neuroscience |
||
8
|
Classic British Conservatism |
Edmund Burke Reflections |
|
| Mon | 11
|
Finding Homo Economicus |
|
13
|
Taboo Tradeoffs |
||
15
|
Free Will |
||
| Mon | 18
|
Moral Education |
Krepsky Scott; Smith Kelly |
20
|
Cynicism and Personality |
Pearson Sarah; Petersen Kirsten |
|
22
|
Easter Break |
||
| Mon | 25
|
Easter Break |
|
27
|
Objectification / Character Education |
Higgins Anna; Xiong Kabao |
|
29
|
Bad Habits & Impulse Control |
Crouch Anna; Teska Zachary |
|
| May, Mon | 2
|
Addiction and Morality |
Mork Daniel; Nail Elizabeth |
4
|
Naturalizing Ethics |
Aron David; Larsen Emmett |
|
6
|
Morality in War |
Langholz Benjamin; Stamp Jeffrey |
|
| Mon | 9
|
Criminal Rehabilitation |
Bieraugel Karen; Gueringer Sam |
11
|
Conservative & Liberal Values & Personality |
Straehley Ian |
|
13
|
Personality/Economics/TBD |
Gallagher James; Tang Yingsi |
|
| Mon | 16
|
Review |
|
| Tues | 24 |
Final: 2 - 4 PM |