Michael's Article Reviews, 2007

Return to Index

Keywords: Curriculum, Planning, Teaching Strategies
Ref: Michael1
Author(s): Tarr, James E.; Reys, Barbara J.; Barker, David D.; Billstein, Rick
Year of Publication: 2006
Title: Selecting High-Quality Mathematics Textbooks
Journal or Publisher: Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School
Volume, Issue, Pages: Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 50-54
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review:  February 12, 2007

As the title suggests, this article walks us through the key elements of textbook selection. Research shows that the majority of teachers work from a single textbook for a course, and students are expected to make use of this text, as well. Therefore, the choice of text is a very important one. The three points of emphasis in this article are the mathematical content emphasis, instructional focus, and teacher support provided by a textbook.

For content emphasis, the authors note that a wide range of topics are included in many textbooks in order to align with diverse state and district curriculum requirements. However, they note the importance of selecting texts that continue to develop skills, rather than being redundant, and provide students with contextual purposes for learning mathematics.

For instructional focus, the authors discuss the importance of a textbook's providing of problems, activities, and investigations that can engage students and lead them to seek out mathematical ends to these problems. Quality textbooks should also provide the means to connect new ideas to prior knowledge.

For teacher support, the authors highlight the importance of textbooks that offer teachers insight into engaging students in mathematics, as well as providing a clear educational/instructional path. Quality textbooks should also provide ideas for applying activities to a diverse student population and give the teacher appropriate assessment resources.

I found this article to be both valuable and interesting because I have wondered what the process is that a teacher goes through in choosing a textbook. Therefore, through this article I now have a guide for how these decisions should be made. Were I able to cut apart this issue, I would keep the purple summary boxes for future reference, as they provide sets of questions that a teacher should ask him- or herself during this selection process. A textbook that is strong in these three aforementioned areas should alleviate some stress from a teacher, as it provides a strong support for both the teacher and student.

Return to Index

Keywords: Teaching Strategies, Planning, Communications
Ref: Michael3
Author(s): Reinhart, Steven C.
Year of publication : 2000
Title: Never Say Anything a Kid Can Say!
Journal or Publisher: Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School
Volume, Issue, Pages: Vol. 5, No. 8, p. 478-483
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: February 28, 2007

Mr. Reinhart, a math teacher at Chippewa Falls Middle School in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, provides an article that provides both future and current teachers with many relevant thoughts and ideas to ponder. His article describes what I believe should be seen as the natural progression of a teacher. This is a progression that is necessitated (and facilitated) by asking one’s self various questions over time.

What should be taught? How should it be taught? Should the classroom be teacher-centered or student-centered? These sorts of questions posed themselves throughout the article. As the title of the article states, teachers should “never say anything a kid can say.” We should let the thoughts and words that are floating around be the students’ thoughts and words whenever possible. Students that verbally question and reason are students that are showing engagement and understanding. By being more of a questioner, the teacher puts students in the driver’s seat in the classroom. By asking for more than just “correct answers,” a teacher forces his or her students to try to gain an understanding of their level of understanding.

Participation is the key to the student-centered classroom that Mr. Reinhart is attempting to build. His “think, pair, share” strategy is based on trying not to overwhelm students (especially middle school children) with the pressure of sharing their thoughts with a room full of their peers. It encourages students to work at a comfortable pace, and it allows them to build support behind any presentations they make. Beyond this strategy, however, Reinhart highlights several other quality teaching tactics that encourage participation. From having students use hand signals during large group discussions, to taking the pencil out of his hand during individual assistance, this article is laced with tips that math teachers, both current and future, should take to heart.

I found Mr. Reinhart’s article to be valuable because of its practicality. As a future teacher, I often find myself asking the questions that Reinhart has posed answers to. While he notes that it is nearly impossible to use everything he suggests at all times, his ideas lend perspective, and potential guidelines, to the idea of developing as a teacher, which is a development that hopefully continues through all of our careers.

Return to Index

Keywords: Assessment, Connections
Ref: Michael4
Author(s): Cramer, Kathleen; Wyberg, Terry
Year of publication : 200?
Title: When Getting the Right Answer is Not Always Enough: Connecting How Students Order Fractions and Estimate Sums and Differences
Journal or Publisher: The Learning of Mathematics
Volume, Issue, Pages: p. 205-220
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: March 7, 2007

Kathleen Cramer and some guy named Terry Wyberg present us with an article about the connections we can see between how students order fractions and their success in estimating sums and differences of fractions. Thus, the purpose is stated as “bringing out the different strategies that children use as they solve problems and how these strategies can be highlighted to help children make connections among the topics they learn” (206). What they are interested in are the strategies used by the students, whether or not the answers presented are correct. We see these strategies through the scope of three students – Kevin, Ben and Natalie.

When comparing fractions, it is possible for students to use either conceptual or procedural strategies. A student’s choice of method may play a role in how he or she thinks about the size of fractions, which therefore affects his or her way of operating on these fractions. The nice thing about the three students mentioned is that they all offer a different perspective on how others may approach working with fractions.

Kevin showed a preference for finding common denominators when ordering fractions. When doing fraction estimation, his common denominator method produced exact answers, but defeated the purpose of estimation. When pushed to estimate, he struggled, reverting to whole number strategies.

Ben used a percent strategy to order the fractions, converting via calculator. When the calculator was removed, he used a difference perspective, which is far too inaccurate. He also reverts to a whole number strategy for sums of fractions.

Natalie approached the ordering problems by visualizing “pieces” that connect fractions to a more concrete model. This would qualify as a conceptual strategy. Natalie was able to use this understanding to make sounder sum estimates than Kevin and Ben.

Perhaps the most interesting/valuable part of the article was the set of questions at the end. While we can identify student preferences, as above, and their strengths and weaknesses, we do not get anywhere with this if we don’t ask and attempt to answer these questions. We notice that Natalie showed the strongest grasp of fraction values. We also notice, however, that there are times and places for Kevin and Ben’s methods, and the best case scenario would be students who are equipped with all of these fraction tools.

Return to Index

Keywords: Algebra, Activities
Ref: Michael5
Author(s):
Year of publication :
Title: Trout Pond Population
Journal or Publisher: NCTM
Volume, Issue, Pages: illuminations.nctm.org/LessonDetail.aspx?ID=L476
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: March 16, 2007

For my online lesson, I chose the one entitled "Trout Pond Population." This lesson works on algebraic thinking, focusing on iteration and recursion. The creator of the lesson made a hypothetical situation as such: "Each spring, a trout pond is restocked with fish. That is, the population decreases each year due to natural causes, but at the end of each year, more fish are added. Currently, there are 3000 fish in the pond. Due to fishing, natural death, and other causes, the population decreases by 20% each year, regardless of restocking. At the end of each year, 1000 trout are added to the pond." The students are asked to consider this scenario and make a conjecture as to the long-term effect on the population of this restocking, as well as finding what turns out to be a recursive formula for the population the NEXT year.

There is an activity sheet that goes along with the lesson that I believe I would encourage the students to use if this was their first contact with recursion and iteration. On this sheet there is a table that asks the students to find the number of trout for each year, 1-25, hoping they can thus see the pattern. I think this table would be useful in getting students to see that a table would be a very logical way to organize (and attack) this problem, and hopefully as this topic was discussed further, or reviewed later on, the students would come back to the idea of using a table to help them solve recursion and iteration problems.

There is also a second part to this lesson that brings up the question of, "What would happen if we changed the above parameters for the trout pond?" By parameters, we mean the initial number of fish, the population decrease rate and the restocking number. In order to comfortably manage this exploratory lesson, I think I would (in a class of roughly 24-25) have the students work in pairs, so therefore each student has someone else to bat ideas around with if they're having any difficulty.

Also, when we move into the second phase (changing parameters), these pairings will be helpful because I can assign two pairs each to one of the six parameter change situations - lowering or raising each of the three parameters - and then have them meet in that group of about four to get their ideas together and perhaps even present what they believe would be the effects of their respective parameter changes.

Return to Index

Keywords: Number and Operation, Representations
Ref: Michael6
Author(s): Lappan, Glenda; Fey, James T.; Fitzgerald, William M.; Friel, Susan N.; Phillips, Elizabeth Difanis
Year of publication :
Title:
Journal or Publisher:
Volume, Issue, Pages:
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: Select month Select day of month, 2007

>From reading page 1 of the "Accentuate the Negative" book, we see that the major focus of the investigations within the book is on understanding. The creators of this book are trying to drive home the point that operating on integers can be very confusing if there is no background for how and why a person computes in the way he or she does. What is a negative integer? How do we determine whether a negative integer is greater or less than another negative integer? What does it mean to add, subtract, multiply or divide integers with opposite signs? These are the sorts of questions that students should be able to answer if they really understand the math they are doing.

The approach they take to gaining this understanding is one that is immersed in models. Number lines, chip boards, thermometers and graphs are all excellent tools for helping students to fully grasp operating on integers. One or more of these models can be used to express the answers to each of the above questions. Looking to page 1f, we see the mathematical and problem-solving goals of the "Accentuate" book. Among them are the questions I have raised, along with many other goals. The most important thing to see with these goals, however, is how they are all related to one another, all building on the same concepts.

I really enjoyed this overview of the "Accentuate" book, not only for the questions and goals it brings forth, but also for the examples that exist in this pre-text text. Some of these examples include: relating adding a negative and subtracting a positive integer, number line understanding of the comparative value of negative integers, opposite chips (+1 + -1 = 0), and understanding the multiplication of two negatives by looking at the pattern as one of the numbers decreases from a positive to a negative.

Reviewer: Michael

Return to Index

Keywords: Statistics, Probability
Ref: Michael7
Author(s): Schielack, Jr., Vincent P.
Year of publication : 1995
Title: Baseball Cards, Collecting, and Mathematics
Journal or Publisher: Connecting Mathematics Across the Curriculum (NCTM)
Volume, Issue, Pages: p. 210-218
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: April 4, 2007

With baseball season starting up again (as I listen to Ramon Ortiz pitch in the Twins-Orioles game), I figured an article on baseball related items seemed fitting (Ortiz just induced his third pop out of the inning, by the way). What this article really discusses is the importance of meaningful mathematics for students. There are a large number of students who take interest in sports and sports card collecting (or collecting in any other way, for that matter), and therefore, baseball cards can be a wonderful mathematical tool, especially in the fields of statistics and probability.

Why statistics? Well, on the back of most baseball cards you can find a player's career (and year-by-year) statistics in a variety of categories, including at-bats, hits, and batting average. Of course there are many other categories that are kept track of, but the author chose these three to analyze because of the fact that batting average is found by using a function (hits/at-bats) of the other two. Baseball cards can invite students to analyze calculations and create statistics of their own.

Why probability? Well, in collecting, many people attempt to get complete sets of a type of baseball cards (or any other item), or they attempt to get individual players. Since the cards that one buys in a pack can be considered random, things such as the Monte Carlo techniques and Expected Values become applicable. For example, we can determine the expected number of packs of cards needed to attain a complete set of x cards.

I found this article interesting because I spent a great deal of my youth earnings on sports cards. More seriously, the article appealed to me because I am always keeping my eyes open for real-life applications and interesting connections to use in my future classroom. This article highlighted the value of baseball and baseball cards as statistics and probability tools. Those are two more tools for my future teaching. (By the way, the Twins now lead, 1-0 through 1.5 innings... is there any mathematical value we can get from this??)

Return to Index

Keywords: Representations, Issues
Ref: Michael8
Author(s): Carpenter, Thomas; Franke, Megan Loef; Levi, Linda
Year of publication : 2003
Title: Thinking Mathematically. Chapter 2: Equality
Journal or Publisher: Heinemann Books
Volume, Issue, Pages: pages 8-24
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: April 11, 2007

This article is about how students, especially elementary school students, interpret the equal sign. There is often the misinterpretation of the equal sign as a command to carry out a calculation, instead of simply "denoting the relation between two equal quantities" (9). The article looks at what may be sources of this misinterpretation, through the scope of student examples. There are Lucy and Barb's situations, where they make the assumption that the "answer" always comes right after the equal sign, and thus their solutions to 8+4=x+5 include x=12. Randy, on the other hand, disregards order and simply accounts for the addition signs, arriving at the sum of the three given values, 17.

Even when these mistakes are pointed out, children seem to have a great deal of difficulty departing from the early conceptions they have formed for what "=" means. What the authors of this article suggest is that, in order to break these habits (or to stop them from forming in the first place) teachers should invite their students to explore the meaning of = through true/false number sentences that are eventually replaced with open number sentences. Four benchmarks are set. The first is that students are simply able to discuss their thoughts on the meaning of =. Second, students are able to "accept as true some number sentence that is not of the form a+b=c." Third, students are able to recognize the equal relationship between the left and right sides of the equal sign. Fourth, is the comparison of mathematical expressions without actually performing the calculations (19).

I like any ideas about how to strengthen students conceptions of important mathematical ideas, and the equal sign is definitely one of those important ideas. There are too many student who struggle understanding the manipulation that takes place in algebra because they don't see that what you do to one side of an equation you must do to the other, since the equality of the sides must be preserved.

Return to Index

Keywords: Algebra
Ref: Michael9
Author(s): Usiskin, Zalman
Year of publication :
Title: Conceptions of School Algebra and Uses of Variables
Journal or Publisher: Algebraic Thinking, Grades K-12
Volume, Issue, Pages: p. 7-13
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: April 21, 2007

This article really attacks the question of, "What is algebra?" The author identifies five varieties of algebra, including formulas, equation solving, identities, properties, and functions. The principle behind all of these forms is the ability to use letters to represent numbers. These letters, of course, have been collectively termed "variables."

The author looks at four different conceptions of algebra. The first, algebra as generalized arithmetic, is a means of looking at patterns. The second, algebra as a study of procedures, involves the use of variables in holding a place, either for unknowns or constants, that are to be solved for. The third, algebra as the study of relationships among quantities, looks at things like area, where L and W affect A, and all other functions (e.g. f(x)) where there is a relationship between an input and output. The fourth conception is algebra as the study of structures, which involves things like groups and rings and how the properties of algebra carry over to these structures.

Our concerns, as future teachers, lie in two fundamental algebra issues. The first is the extent to which algebraic manipulation by hand needs to be known. The advent of computer technology is the factor coming into play here. The second issue is about the timing of the introduction of the function to a student's mathematical world. Some see functions as a major vehicle of all algebra learning, and some see them as too advanced and confusing for students just beginning the study of algebraic ideas.

Return to Index

Keywords: Activities, Problem Solving
Ref: Michael10
Author(s):
Year of publication :
Title: Lesson 2: Multiplying Matrices
Journal or Publisher:
Volume, Issue, Pages: p. 26-35
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: April 30, 2007

This is a very difficult "article" to write a reading response to, since it is a lesson more than it is an article. Therefore, I will just comment on my opinion of the pros and cons of this lesson. The subject, of course, is matrix multiplication.

What I really liked about this lesson is that it was very thorough. There were something like 40 different questions asked throughout the lesson, and each of them probed a valuable area of understanding matrices. Because the questions were often introduced before the cold, hard process, the students were thus forced to bring in prior thoughts and understandings and apply them to the given problems. Matrix multiplication serves as a simplification, or a mathematical representation of the common strain of thought. Thus, it's easy to like the fact that the students were given the opportunity to "discover" matrix multiplication and how matrix dimensions relate.

One of the things that I didn't like about the lesson is that it is definitely too long to comfortably present in a regular (non-block) class period. With forty-some questions, there obviously wouldn't be a whole lot of time to really stop and think. However, over a two-day period, this lesson might be fine. The one other thing that I was somewhat uncomfortable with was the lack of description for a "rule" for matrix multiplication. I understand that this whole exploration creates the rule(s) for the students, but looking at some of the problems they were presented with, I could see being forced to take your exploration and apply it to unlabeled matrices as a little overwhelming. Some students, I'm sure, would like to have something a little more succinct in front of them as they are getting used to this new tool.

Return to Index

Keywords: Algebra, Representations,
Ref: Michael11
Author(s): Steen, Lynn Arthur; Herbert, Kristen; Rosnick, Peter
Year of publication : 1999
Title: Algebraic Thinking
Journal or Publisher: NCTM
Volume, Issue, Pages: p. 49-51, p.123-128, p. 313-315
Reviewer: Michael
Date of Review: May 2, 2007

This review will contain three brief reviews of three separate articles from the book, "Algebraic Thinking." The first article was titled, "Does Everybody Need to Study Algebra?" The author argues in favor of this, but with a less rigid view of what we should deem to be algebra. First-year algebra should not be such a dominant structure that it makes the assumption that all students are alike. The lock-step Algebra, Geometry, Algebra II structure should not exist without three essential environmental pieces: context, community and connections. Students must be given challenges appropriate to them. The goal of mathematical instruction for all students should be learning to "read, write, speak, and listen with language that employs mathematical ideas" (51).

The second article I chose is titled, "Patterns as Tools for Algebraic Reasoning." This article was written with a problem as its framework, where there is a group of people needing to cross a river with a single boat, where the question is, "How many trips will it take to get everyone across?" This question is meant to probe student understanding of what is going on, and lead to a generalization for a group of X number of people. The author describes the students' investigation as a three-step process: pattern seeking, pattern recognition, and then generalization. It is the generalization that shows the students the power of algebraic thinking. Students learn to perceive patterns will obviously grow in their confidence of their own mathematical abilities.

The third article was titled, "Some Misconceptions concerning the Concept of Variable." The article discussed the "path of increasing abstraction," that a mathematics curriculum naturally follows (313). As things become more abstract, what is lost in translation is often what our symbols are actually being used to stand for. The idea of a reversed equation is discussed at great length, where we see student misconceptions about how to translate sentences into mathematical phrases (314). What we need to do is to make sure we protect the distinction between different ideas, and attempt to foster a greater understanding of what variables and equations are in our classrooms.



Disclaimer